CRTC orders major IPs to offer smaller resellers the same Internet speeds
Monday, August 30, 2010 at 05:15PM 
The Canadian Radio-Television Communications Commission (CRTC) is sticking to its guns and ordering big phone network owners such as Bell and Telus to offer smaller wholesale companies higher internet speeds, despite previous disagreement from the government.
Network owners will be required to offer whatever internet speeds they themselves sell to retail customers to smaller companies that rent portions of their networks, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission affirmed Monday. The requirement is necessary to maintain competition and reasonable prices for broadband services, the regulator said.
"Access to broadband internet services is a key foundation for the digital economy," CRTC chairman Konrad von Finckenstein stated. "The large telephone and cable companies are bringing their fibre networks closer to Canadian homes and businesses, which allows for faster internet connections. Requiring these companies to provide access to their networks will lead to more opportunities for competition in retail internet services and better serve consumers."
The decision reaffirms a December 2008 CRTC ruling, which was remanded for reconsideration a year later by Industry Minister Tony Clement. The government acceded to lobbying from the big phone companies and ordered the CRTC to review its decision on the grounds that it had failed to consider a number of issues:
- How the matching speeds would diminish the phone companies' incentives to invest in new infrastructure.
- Whether there is sufficient competition to protect consumers without the requirement of matching speeds.
- Whether the regulatory requirements on phone and cable companies are equal.
- How the matching-speeds requirement would affect phone companies' abilities to offer services such as television over an internet connection.
Smaller internet providers such as Teksavvy and Execulink had argued that without requirements to offer matching speeds, the big companies would put them out of business. Bell and Telus are selling internet connections of up to 25 and 15 megabits per second respectively over newer fibre-based networks, but smaller providers can typically offer speeds of no more than five megabits per second over older copper-based infrastructure.
The CRTC said it would allow phone companies to charge smaller providers an extra 10-per-cent mark-up to use their newer infrastructure in order to recoup the costs of their investments.
The regulator also said it would require cable companies to modify their existing internet access services to make it easier for smaller, "alternative" providers to connect to them. Cable companies are already required to offer matching speeds.
Small providers were denied their request to require phone and cable companies to reconfigure their networks to offer additional services, such as television. The CRTC said forcing such a reconfiguration "would constitute a disincentive to network investments without necessarily enhancing innovation or competition."
Commissioner Timothy Denton attached a dissenting opinion, which agreed with most of the ruling but chided the reconfiguration denial. The denial prevents smaller internet providers from getting around the download limits or throttling imposed on certain uses, such as peer-to-peer software, by network owners, he said.
"The current ambivalence about the role and legitimacy of smaller carriers continues. They are allowed to exist but denied the means to innovate," he said. "In a business with as much uncertainty as this, turning down the possibility for technical and business innovation seems a riskier move than letting it go ahead.
Some smaller internet providers were pleased with the majority of the decision, but agreed with Denton.
"The CRTC’s approach will entrench the duopolistic nature of the communications wireline services industry in many important markets and stifle the ability of competitors to provide new and innovative services," said Teksavvy's chief technology officer Marc Gaudrault in a statement.
"In this environment, it will be very difficult for competitors to attract the capital necessary to innovate, grow and contribute to the greatest extent possible to the competitive landscape and increase consumer choice."
Ken Engelhart, vice-president of regulatory affairs for Rogers, said that although the decision went about as expected, some issues remain. Phone companies, for example, can charge 10 per cent more for access to their higher-speed infrastructure, but cable companies cannot.
"They seem pretty concerned about symmetry between phone and cable, which is fair enough, I think, but they seem to have introduced a couple of asymmetries in this decision," he said. "So much for the level playing field."
Network owners will have 90 days to propose to the CRTC the charges they intend to charge smaller internet providers.
The regulator said it will consider the phase-out of mandated internet access when alternatives such as wireless and satellite become more accepted as substitutes.
Monday's decision is likely to put pressure back on the federal government, which will have to decide whether to overrule the regulator or let the CRTC's requirement stand. The cabinet has 90 days to make a decision.
A spokesperson for Industry Canada did not immediately return a request for comment.
From CBC News
IMPORTANT: No advice is offered or given in this article or this publication. PLEASE ALWAYS REFER TO AN EXPERT before acting on any information contained in any of our stories.
Copyright © 2006-10, Blogertize Publications (http://www.blogertize.com), except as otherwise indicated. Text may be excerpted UNALTERED with FULL CREDIT and LINK. PHOTOS MAY NOT BE COPIED, DOWNLOADED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT PERMISSION. Note: Some photos of real people may be models used to illustrate the editorial concept. MISSION: "You Need to Know" Our publications are daily online newspapers and magazines (webzines), plus delivered Ezines. Our stories also appear on various newswire services and are picked up in other publications. Our reporters and journalists break or report stories and their sources and source information are protected by the doctrine of free press as expressed in the First Amendment, Reporter's Privilege statutes, and also the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. COMMENTS FROM USERS: We invite dialogue and comments from our readers and limit moderation to obscenity and privacy issues, however WE ACCEPT NO RESPONSIBILITY WHATSOEVER FOR THIS CONTENT. We believe in the doctrine of FREE SPEECH. COMMENTS AND MOST STORIES ARE FROM OUTSIDE CONTRIBUTORS AND READERS AND NOT A REFLECTION OF THE OPINIONS OF THIS MAGAZINE. The opinions expressed by our writers, columnists and reporters are their opinions and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of this magazine, its writers and staff, or Blogertize Publications.TM - Our magazine names are trademarked. Our publications team provide this ezine and web site and its contents in good faith but makes no representations or warranties of any kind with respect to this web site or its contents. We disclaim any representations and warranties, whether express or implied, including, but not limited to warranties of any kind. In addition, we do not represent or warrant that the information accessible via this web site or the products or services sold or given free on it are accurate, complete or current. Errors and Omissions Excepted. By using/visiting this site you agree that use information herein is at your own risk. PRIVACY: SPAM POLICY: We do not use, nor do we condone the use of unsolicited bulk email. Our email system is an opt-in only. Please report any incidents of unsolicited email coming from or mentioning our domain to editor AT blogeritze.com. All matters will be investigated and dealt with promptly. Jurisdiction: Any action or dispute arising from the use of information on this site will be deemed to have been undertaken and concluded in Toronto, Canada and will be interpreted, construed and enforced in all respects in accordance with the laws of Canada and all parties thereto shall submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Ontario courts. A visitor agrees that the applicable law to be applied shall, in all cases, be that of the city of the web site owner, namely, Toronto, Canada.
Persona Corp. and Blogertize publishes several webzines, magazines, e-zines for news, entertainment and information, but cautions readers to read the USAGE NOTICE. Our mandate: "You Need to Know!"
• Auto News (autonews.co): The latest news, reviews and views on all things automobile
• Automobile Buzz (automobilebuzz.com): Everyone's favorite zine with the latest road tests, videos, and breaking news with special focus on sportscars and greencars
• Films and Books Magazine - News from Hollywood and New York, Books and Films
• Webzine (webzine.co): Reviews of the best, newest and brightest of webzines, print to web conversion zines, ezines and online publications.
* Noetic News: News, Features, Research on the Science of Consciousness
* Dog and Cat World: You can't know too much about your best friend.
* Advance Magazine - Body, Mind, Spirit
* LINK Magazine: Good News Report
* Buddha Weekly - Buddhist news, events, profiles from all traditions.
Social Network
Contributors
• Derek Armstrong, Chief Crime Correspondent, Crime Report USA, contributor various
Reader Comments